Scam of the Dollar, Money, Cash – Wake up People!!!

If the Federal Reserve Note erroneously called [Money or Cash] is worthless pieces of paper per the Federal Reserve Bank publication “Modern Money Mechanics” why are Moors fighting each other for it? Did not Prophet Noble Drew Ali say “there will come a day when you will see a twenty note [dollar] bill on the floor and you will step over it”? Wake up you sleepy headed Moors, the ball is in your court – Home Rule Advantage!!!

Federal Reserve Scam.pdf


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

People, All People…WAKE UP!!! Your Constitutionally Secured unalienable Rights are being LIENED!!!

Now the employees/corporate security guards/European males with guns of NEW YORK CITY corporation are in a slick way trying to justify their actions and move the People away from the true issue at hand…Be clear they DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT, AUTHORITY, OR JURISDICTION to interfere with the People.

NEW YORK CITY is a corporation!!! Even is you google and find their 2004 charter it says they are a corporation doing business under the name of NEW YORK CITY.

So tell me, how does a corporation get the right to injure the people and then talk about they were well within their rights? And did so because their corporate policy, which is private and has nothing to do with the people and is treason and fraud. This corporate policy states they can arrest, make assumptions of the people free right to travel, resisting [arrest] assault of a complete stranger, alleged criminal trespass, etc.

Remember all authority MUST be delegated!!!

Now since government is created for the People, by the People, it is the People who must delegate. Not even an alleged representative can delegate and if they do the People have a right to alter any thing they are NOT in agreement with!!!

All powers are delegated from the People to the public servants.

So where in the American Constitution 1791 does it authorize any power to be delegated to a corporation who then set up alleged courts without any delegation of authority pursuant to Article III of the American Constitution 1791 that literally rape the People? Where is that in the American Constitution 1791? In other words pursuant to  the 9th Bill of Rights, if it is not enumerated in the American Constitution 1791 then it is reserved to the People!!!

New York state republic, which is guaranteed pursuant to Article 4, Section 4 of the American Constitution 1791, a republican form of government, is “bound” and “obligated” to protect the People!!! Their silence when the People are injured/murdered and their liberties are grossly violated is Treason and implies they are receiving bribes to remain silent in the face of the Publicized assault on the People.

Why are those public servants, who take an Oath to the American Constitution 1791 to protect the People, silent?

Why is the United Nations, who “Mission Statement” professes to be about promoting peace around the world, silent when the last thing that is going on is peace?

Why does the International Police, INTERPOL, remain silent when it is publicized that the Corporate security [Police] of these Corporations doing business as the COUNTY, CITY, TOWN, TOWNSHIP, BOROUGHS, are literally murdering the People, kidnapping them and placing them in prison, which are private contractors, for profit?

Why is everyone silent!!!

But most important, why are the People silent?

Don’t you see that the Mayor of all these COUNTY/CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP/BOROUGHS are nothing more than CEO’s? And your voting for corporate executives?

In the corporate world only the Board of Directors can vote in executive officers. Are you on the Board of Directors for the NEW YORK CITY corporation?

If so when was the last time you received a dividend payment? That is what members of the Board of Directors would receive however instead the People are extorted/robbed of any and all finance.

Remember when the gangs that were called organized crime syndicates received finance/income and they do not provide a product or service that was called “Racketeering”!!!

Take a look at not just NEW YORK CITY corporation but all the COUNTY/CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP/BOROUGH corporations. You are witnessing, live in the flesh an organized crime syndicate extorting finance from the people under the guise of “government”, a violation of Title 18 section 912.

They send an extortion demand to the people and they say this is your taxes, you must pay, protection payment. They say you must turn your property over to use, however police call it a motor vehicle, however the Supreme Court identifies your car, as household goods, and if you don’t go through their private process that they call the motor vehicle registration and license process, a lien on your right to travel. We will steal your stuff, kidnap you and throw you in prison and receive income because we will submit fraudulent bonds, beginning with a bail bondsman, with an expected performance that they do not unveil to you so that you can violate the alleged agreement and they can revoke the bond. Know this, any and all agreements entered into under threat, duress, and coercion are void ab initio, from its beginning.

By the way did you know that the People can never be bonded? They are NOT the public servants, they do not have an Oath to be bonded against.

The “bond” is a racket!!! They will prepare a performance bond, but they will not disclose it to you, of course this is done fraudulently by the corporations, so your creating a fraudulent contract with a corporation to do something that you do not know you are suppose to do. So when you are not privy to what you are suppose to do, naturally you are being set up to fail hence the revoking of the “bond”. Just so you know, it was all fraudulently done to begin with. And who is the person who authorized the bond? The Magistrate who pursuant to the Supreme Court has NO judicial powers, well they are not even sanctioned to be a court – so naturally that is why they have no judicial powers.

Why do they revoke the fraudulent bond? Because it is more profitable for them to broker the bond, receive income, force you against your will to work and receive income, cut off all form of communication once they kidnap you and then force you to use other colluding corporations whereby your family must first pay enormous sums of income before you can even talk and that conversation is recorded which is a violation of the People right to privacy, a violation of due process of law, a complete war against the People of the land.

Did you know that pursuant to Article I of the American Constitution 1791 only the United States Congress can write laws?

Did you know that the State/Comonwealth are not writing laws? It is the General Assembly that is writing laws. Do you know who the General Assembly is?

General Assemblies were set up around the fifteen to sixteen hundreds by Great Britain, The Dutch Republic, The Sweden Republic, and Denmark to name a few. Their purpose was to write laws relative to the commerce [product] they were permitted by treaty agreement to engage in here on this Continent. They were originally called General Corte, the name was changed to General Court, that then changed to General Assembly. There you have it. The alleged law that are today fraudulently and violently being forced on the people are foreign policies for companies today incorporated as corporations. That is a violation of the American Constitution which “bounds” the public servant to protect the People against foreign and domestic invasion. Yet is seems everyone is profiting off of the blood of the People, that’s Human Trafficking/Genocide.

With all this those public servants who took an Oath to the American Constitution 1791 remain silent? That sounds like someone is taking a bribe to remain silent!!!  This war against the People of this land are publicize on the television, they publish it in their alleged newspapers, and also on the internet. They even make video and audio recording of their many acts of genocide and the public servants who took an oath to the American Constitution 1791, who receive income from the People they allege to represent are silent!!!

Someone is taking a bribe to remain silent!!!


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Breaking News of one our family members that were brutally murdered!!! Stand!!!

Below is a very disturbing video clip of an innocent young man who was murdered by the corporate security of NEW YORK CITY Corporation.

Everyone needs to write a cause of action regarding this.

This is stalking, profiling, murder, etc.

Looks like a dozen employees of the NEW YORK CITY corporation allege that this man was resisting arrest…Is this what is called resisting arrest these days? And unfortunately most people do not know that the People have a right to resist arrest especially if it is unwarranted and in violation of the American Constitution 1791.

Know this, the police are not Constitutionally Sanctioned, they are not officers, officers are elected. Police are hired by the Mayor who in truth is the CEO of NEW YORK CITY corporation!!!

This is murder…Everyone must document and writ a cause of action. Do not let this young brothers take a big hit for the family for nothing!!! Do not let his death be in vain…Everyone writ a cause of action, download this, send it everywhere. If you didn’t know what genocide is, if you didn’t know what stalking is, if you didn’t know what murder is…Watch this video and you will know.

And Family – stop calling these mercenaries!!! This is how they keep their jobs to continue killing our family. Police are not here to protect the People, they are here to protect the corporation and their interest.

It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers. (SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247)

They allege that he was resisting arrest, well he has a Constitutionally Secured right to resist!!! Especially from a pack of wild wolfs that jumped on this brother and murdered him.

” Supreme Court has held that the officer has no right (to arrest a Citizen) unless certain procedures (constitutional protections) are adhered to…Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”  John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.

John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.

“Common as the event may be, it is a serious thing to arrest a citizen, and it is a more serious thing to search his person; and he who accomplishes it, must do so in conformity to the law of the land. There are two reasons for this; one to avoid bloodshed, and the other to preserve the liberty of the citizen. Obedience to the law is the bond of society, and the officers set to enforce the law are not exempt from its mandates.”) see also: Allen v. State, 197 N.W. 808, 810-11 (Wis 1924)

“An illegal arrest is an assault & battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault & battery.”  State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260.

Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80;

“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and, if in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.”.  see also: Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1

Housh v. People, 75 111. 491

“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” ; reaffirmed & quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447;  State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.

Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910

“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.”  

Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I

These principles apply as well  to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority & transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force & violence. ; see also Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.

State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100.

Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest.  In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self-defense.”

Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306.
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer’s life if necessary.”   This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in this case:
“Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that a situation could arise in which the checks-&-balances principle ceased to work & the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.’ There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, If there be any remedy at all … it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.’ That was the ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.'” (From “Mutiny on the Amistad” by Howard Jones, Oxford Univ. Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court.

“The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, & orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace.” Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197

“It is the law that a person illegally arrested by an officer may resist that arrest, even to the extent of the taking of life, if his own life or any great bodily harm is threatenedState v. Rousseau, 40 Wash. 2nd, 92, 241 P. 2nd. 447, 449 (1952)  see also:  Porter v. State, 124 Ga. 297, 52 S.E. 283, 287 (1905); see also State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2nd 100, 102 (1954); Wilkinson v. State, 143 Miss. 324, 108 So. 711, 712-13 (1926); American Jurisprudence, 2nd Ed., “Arrest”, Section 94, pp. 778-780; Thomas v. State, 91 Ga. 204, 18 S.E. 305 (1892); Presley v. State, 75 Fla. 434, 78 So. 532, 534 (1918); Burkhard v. State, 83 Tex. Crim. 228, 202 S.W. 513; Mullins v. State, 196 Ga. 569, 27 S.E. 2nd. 91 (1943); Ownes v. State, 58 Tex. Crim. 261, 125 S.W. 405 (1910); Caperton v. Commonwealth, 189 Ky. 652, 655, 225 S.W. 481, 481 (1920)

“The United States Supreme Court, and every other court in the past deciding upon the matter, has recognized that “at common Law”, a person had the right to “resist the illegal attempt to arrest him.” John Bad Elk v. United States, 177 U.S. 529, 534-35 (1899). State v. Robinson, 145 Me 77, 72 Alt. 2d 260, 262 (1950). State v. Gum, 68 W. Va. 105. State v. Rouseau, 40 Wash. 2d. 92, 241, 242 P.2d 447, 449 (1952). State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 446, 83 S.E., 2d 100, 102 (1954). Wilkinson v. State, 143 Miss. 324, 108 So. 711. Thomas v. State, 91 Ga. 204, 18 SE 305 Presley v. State, 75 Fla. 434, 78 So. 523. Burkhardt v. State, 83 Tex Crim 228, 202 S.W. 513Mullis v. State, 196 Ga. 569, 27 SE 2d 91 (1943). Owen v. State, 58 Tex Crim 261, 125 S.W. 405 (1910). Franklin,118 Ga. 860, 45 S.E. 698 (1903). Graham v. State, 143 Ga. 440 85 S.E. 328, 331 City of Columbus v. Holmes, 152 N.W. 2d, 301, 306 (Ohio App. 1058). Adams v. State, 121 Ga 163, 48 S.E. 910 (1904). Robertson v. State, 198 S. W2d 633, 635-36 Tenn. (1947). Roberts v. Dean, 187 So. 571, 575 Fla. 1939. The State of Connecticut against Leach, 7 Conn, Rep. 452 (1829) Housh v. The People, 75 ILL Rep. 487, 491 (1874). Plummer v. The State, 135 Ind. 308, 313, 334 N.E. 968 (1893).  People v. Hevern, 127 Misc. Rep. 141, 215 NY Supp 412. U.S. v. Cerciello, 86 NJL 309, 90 Atl.1112, (1914). U.S. v. Kelly, 51 Fed 2d 263 (1931) Bednarik v. Bednarik, 16 A 2d, 80, 90, 18 NJ Misc. 633 (1948). State v. Height, 117 Iowa 650, 91 NW 935. People v. Corder, 244 Mich. 274, 221 NW 309. Boyd v. U.S., 116 U.S. 616. State v. Newcomb, 220 Mo 54 119 SW 405. Town of Blacksburg v. Bean, 104 S.C. 146. 88 S.E. 441 (1916) Allen v. State, 197 N.W. 808, 810-11(Wis 1924). Adarns v. State, 121 Ga 163, 48 S.E. 910 (1904) Green v.Kennedy, 48 N.Y. Rep. 653, 654 (1871). Hicks v. Matthews, 266 S.W. 2nd. 846, 849 (Tex. 1954). Porter v. State, 124 Ga. 297, 52 S.E. 283, 287 (1905). Mullins v. State,196 Ga. 569, 27 S.E. 2nd. 91 (1943). Caperton v. Commonwealth, 189 Ky. 652, 655, 225 S.W. 481, 481 (1920)

Notice how heavy handed they were, once they took his pulse and realized they murdered him, then they touching him with two fingers. And the Foreign european male with the gun that had on the shirt with the makings “99”, once he realized he murdered the brother after pressing his face into the sidewalk with his knee…he is far from the scene after he murders him. 


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Check out how the politicians are trying to save their a#@!!!

What’s interesting about the below attached documents is the alleged income tax for INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES applies only to corporations.

 It does not apply to the compensation of labor of the People

 If they are compelling the People to pay a corporate tax then they are saying the People are nothing moor than corporations, property of the united states therefore they owe the beneficiaries of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE trust.

That sounds like TREASON!!!!

 This is why the politicians who have known all about this are now trying to repeal the 16th amendment that Constitutionally is not law and was never ratified however was imposed on the People.

The sugar is about to hit the fan and that is why they are trying to clean up now.

Congress can say whatever they want however it is the People who have the final say so and it just so happens the United States Supreme Court concurs.

“Whatever may constitute income, therefore must have the essential feature of gain to the recipient. This was true when the 16th Amendment became effective, it was true at the time of Eisner vs. Revenue Code of 1938, and it is likewise true under sec. 61(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. If there is no gain there is no income . . . Congress has taxed income, not compensation [wages].” (Connor vs. U.S. 303 F. Supp. 1187)

“Only the rare taxpayer would likely to know that he could refuse to produce his records to IRS agents.” (U.S. vs. Dickerson, 413 f2d 1111, CA7, 1969) the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. If there is no gain there is no income . . . Congress has taxed income, not compensation [wages].” (Connor vs. U.S. 303 F. Supp. 1187)

In a report titled “Some Constitutional Questions regarding Federal Income Tax Law” prepared by Howard Zaritsky, Legislative Attorney, American Law Division, Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress # 84188A 784-275, states, “The Supreme Court, in a decision written by Chief Justice White noted that the 16th Amendment did not authorize any new type of tax, did not repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article I of the Constitution. Direct taxes are still subject to the rule of apportionment and indirect taxes are still subject to the rule of uniformity.”

In Evans vs. Gore (1920) the court ruled: “The sixteenth does not justify the taxation of persons or things (their property) previously immune . . . it does not extend taxing power to new or excepted citizens . . . it is intended only to remove all occasions from any apportionment of income taxes among the states. It does not authorize a tax on a salary.”

In 1916, the Supreme Court verified the income tax is not a “Direct Tax.” In Brushaber vs. Union Pacific the court declared: “The contention that the Amendment (16th) treats a tax as a direct tax (which must be apportioned) is wholly without foundation . . . The Amendment was drawn with the object of maintaining the limitations of the Constitution.”

“The tax imposed . . . being a direct tax is unconstitutional and void because [it was] not apportioned . . . constituting one entire scheme . . . The Constitution divided federal taxation into two great classes – the class of direct taxes, and that of [indirect taxes] duties, imposts and excises – and the prescribed two rules which qualified the grant of power as to each class.” (Pollock vs. Farmers Loan and Trust, 158 U.S. 601)

“Income means only gain and profits, not wages.” (So Pacific vs. Lowe, 247 U.S. 330; Stratton vs. Howbert, 231 U.S. 309)

“It is to be noted that by the language of the Act it is not salaries, wages or compensation for personal service that are to be include in gross income.” (Lucas vs. Earl, 281 U.S. 111 1930)

“Income excludes wages, salaries and tips.” (Graves vs. People of N.Y., 59 S. Ct. 595)

“Tips are gifts and are therefore not taxable.” Judge Thomas W. Clary (Okl vs. U.S., February 18, 1975)

“There is a clear distinction between profit and wages or compensation for labor. Compensation [wages] for labor cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law.” (Oliver vs. Halstead, 196 Va. 992; 86 S.E. 2d 858)

“. . . There is a clear distinction between ‘profit’ and ‘wages’ or compensation for labor. Compensation for labor cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law. The word ‘profit’ as ordinarily used, means the gain made upon business or investment – a different thing altogether from mere compensation for labor.” (Commercial League Assc. Vs. The People, 90 Ill 166)

“Reasonable compensation [wages] for labor or services rendered is not profit.” (Lauderdale Cemetery Assc. vs. Mathews 345 Pa. 239; 47 A.2d 277, 280)

“Income means only gain and profit, not earnings.” (Staples vs. U.S. 21 F Sup. 737)

“Freedom in the making of Contracts of Personal employment, by which labor and services are exchanged for money or other forms of property is an elementary part of the rights of personal liberty and private property, not to be struck down directly or arbitrarily with . . .” (Prudential vs. Cheek, 259 U.S. 530)

“Chief among contracts is that of personal employment, by which labor and other services are exchanged for money or other forms of property.” (Coppage vs. Kansas, 35Sct243, 1915)

“The right to labor and to its protection from unlawful interference is a constitutional as well as a common law right. Every man has a natural right to the fruits of his own industry.” (48 Am Jur 2d, Section 2)

“The property which every man has in his labor, is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable.” (Butcher’s Union Co. vs. Crescent City Co., 45 Ct 661)

“Every man has a natural right to the fruits of his own labor, as generally admitted; and no other person can rightfully deprive him of those fruits, and appropriate them at his will.” (The Antelope, 23 U.S. 66, 120)

In Murdock vs. Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court ruled: “A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution.”

In Redfield vs. Fisher the Supreme Court held: “The individual, unlike the corporation cannot be taxed for the mere privilege of existing. The corporation is an artificial entity which owes its existence and charter powers to the state; but the individual rights to live and own property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which an excise tax cannot be imposed.”

“The terms `excise’ and `privilege’ tax are synonymous.” (American Airways vs. Wallace, 57 F 2d 877, 800)

“Congress may not, under the taxing power, assert a power not delegated to it by the constitution.” (Regal Drug Co. vs. Wardell, 260 U.S. 386; 67 L ED 318; 43 S. Ct. 152)

“The Secretary of the Treasury cannot by his regulation alter or amend a Revenue Law.” (Morrill vs. Jones 106 U.S. 407)

“The tax is, of course an excise tax, as are all taxes on income . . .” (White Packing Co. vs. Robertson, 89 F 2d 775, 779 the 4th Circuit Court)

“The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such. It is an excise tax . . .” (Congressional Record, March 27, 1943)

In 1930, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the Brushaber and Pollock cases in Tyler vs. U.S.: “A tax laid upon the happening of an event, as distinguished from its tangible fruits (of our labor), is an indirect tax.”

“People [person] cannot be forced to submit records for inspection.” (U.S., and Fred Rosauer, Special Agent IRS vs. Johanna Van Poperin, U.S. District Court, District of Minn., 4th Division, 4-71 Civil 635)

Bill Text – 113th Congress (2013-2014) – THOMAS (Library of Congress)

Congressman Jim Bridenstine Files Bill to Repeal 16th Amendment

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Revisiting the Fraud of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES, TRUST did you know your were being compelled to pay into a Trust?

Peace and Love Family,

Attached below are the two writs that were referenced on the MHHS Eyes wide open Radio broadcast on 26 November 2013.

You need to review, study, and strategize – know that it is your positive energy that will pave the way!!!

 There are two exhibits referenced.

 Exhibit A – will consist of your prior writs that you aught to have sent certified mail.

            If you did not send prior writs you will need to document what happened to you from the beginning to now. That means without any personal emotions included you will document how your liberties were violated from a Constitutional / Treaty secured right perspective ONLY!!!

Exhibit B – will be the Judicial Notice and any other supporting documents. For example

a. the letter from Congressman Hertel,

b. letter from IRS agent Cynthia J. Mills Disclosure Agent

c. Court Judgment where United States Attorney General states IRS is not an agency of the federal government – attached,

d. Recent decision where IRS agent making complaint must sign under penalty of perjury – attached

e. Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1786

f. American Constitution 1791

g. 1874 Congressional Record – IRS Repealed – attached

(a. – d. – can be found on and also on

Whether you have an issue at this moment with the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES, you can still assist in blitzing this writ to all public servants of all the corporate states, the international community, and any embassies – this can be done via email and/or fax – the point is to let all know you are awake and enforcing the Supreme Law of this Land – the American Constitution 1791

Some Information / Case Law from the show:

“In a recent conversation with an official at the Internal Revenue Service, I was amazed when he told me that ‘If the taxpayers of this country ever discover that the IRS operates on 90% bluff the entire system will collapse’ “.
– Henry Bellmon, Senator (1969)

“Our tax system is based upon voluntary assessment and payment, not upon distraint”.- United States Supreme Court, in Flora v. United States

Our tax system is based on individual self-assessment and voluntary compliance”.
-Mortimer Caplin, Internal Revenue Audit Manual (1975)

“Considering that senior officials at the Internal Revenue Service are fully aware of the fact that there is no law currently in existence making a U.S. citizen liable for or required to pay either the income tax or the social security employment tax, only a truly generous citizen would, upon discovering this, continue to voluntarily donate these taxes to the government by allowing them to be withheld from his paycheck on a 100% voluntary W-4 withholding agreement. But, then again, the IRS would be dead in the water without the “voluntary (and docile) compliance” of employers and employees and has said so all along.” — William Cash, IRS Senior Manager,

One may be employed, do business, and enter into other contracts, and sue and be sued under any name they choose at will Lindon v. First National Bank 10 F. 894, Coppage v. Kansas 236 U.S. 1, In re McUlta 189o F. 250

a. “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than
corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.”* S.C.R. 1795, **Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54;* and,

b. “the contracts between them” involve U.S. citizens, which are deemed as
Corporate Entities:

c. “Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union,
are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an
“individual entity””,* Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed.
1143, 56 S.Ct. 773

Peace and Love

Writ of Removal of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES, IRS v2 Recorded-11252013.pdf

Judicial Proclamation on the Treason of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES, IRS v2 Recorded-11252013.pdf

United States Denies under Oath IRS is an agency of government

IRS Repealed June 22, 1874

Swanson-Flosystems Co. v. Commissioner, No. 27975-11

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Child Support Fraud

Attached below is the writ for the child support fraud. For all those who wish to participate in this blitz it will require you to be active Moors. You will need to obtain fax number, email addresses, and if you so desire mailing locations for those who want to send a hard copy.

For any Moor who currently has an issue with the child support fraud, attach your writ(s) – cause of action, what happened to you – to the attached document and sent it out also.

You want to send to persons operating through the various STATE/COMMONWEALTH  corporations, those near and far. You also want to send this internationally to our International families, you will obtain their email and fax information the same way. There are also various embassies that you can fax and email to.

The purpose is to communicate globally.

As I stated before, this requires you to be active Moors and not passive. As the prophet said, he needs help – we must unite and assist all our brothers and sister in being freed. This is a beginning that will continue until all are freed. Islam

Writ of Mandamus for all Moors-Child Support Fraud v3

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Charge of Treason against Public Servants of the STATE OF MARYLAND as they actively participate in the “Doctrine of Discovery”

Northwest Amexem / Northwest Africa / North America.
‘The North Gate’.
Societas Republicae Ea Al Maurikanos.
Aboriginal and Indigenous Natural Peoples of the Land.
The true and de jure Al Moroccans / Americans.
Breach of Fiduciary Duties,
Charge of Treason against Public Servants of the
Capitis Diminutio Maxima – Denationalization,
and Notice of Breach of Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1786
International Document
For The Record, To Be Read Into The Record
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal – Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent.

Done by the light of day – nine September two-zero one-three.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
7010 1870 0002 5451 4135
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

From: Dominus Nobilis El, Third Party Intervener Authorized Representative for:
Issa Ra El, Aboriginal Indigenous Moor of Maghrib’ al’ Aqca. Secured Party, UCC#181423294, Creditor, Donor, Bailor, Beneficiary/Grantor of transmitting utility Ens Legis, Ex-Relatione Patrick Christopher Lewis and/or any derivative thereof.
All Rights Reserved, w/o prejudice / recourse
U.C.C. 1-207/ 1-308/1-209; U.C.C. 1-103
c/o 141 Weston Street #1145
[Hartford Connecticut [06143-9998]]
Non-domestic without the United States of America
Northwest Amexem – Maghrib’ al’ Aqca (Morocco the extreme west)

To: Office of the Governor
Attention: Martin O’Malley
Office of Lieu tent Governor
Attention: Anthony G. Brown
Office of the Secretary of State
Attention: John P. McDonough
Office of Attorney General
Attention: Douglas F. Gansler
Office of State Attorney
Attention: Angela D. Alsobrooks
Office of County Attorney
Attention: M. Andree Green
Office of Deputy State’s Attorney
Tara A. Harrison
Office of the Comptroller
Attention: Peter V. R. Franchot
Office of Acting Secretary of Transportation
Attention: Darrell B. Mosley
Office of State Court Administrator
Attention: Frank V. Broccolina
Office of County Executive
Attention: Rushern L. Baker III
Office of Sheriff
Attention: Melvin C. High
Attention : [Sheriff] Beck
Office of Secretary of State Police
Attention: Marcus L. Brown
Office of Transportation Authority Police Tunnel Command
Attention: Corey McKenzie
Office of Chief of Police Prince George County
Attention: Michael T. Gonnella

Office of Counsel Motor Vehicle
Attention: Jonathan W. Acton II
Office of Clerk of Court
Attention: Julie Enso Thomar
Office of Maryland General Assembly Senate President
Attention: Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr.
Office of Maryland General Assembly Speaker House of Delegates
Attention: Michael Erin Busch
Office of Insurance Commissioner
Attention: Theresa M. Goldsmith, Esq.
Office of Circuit Administrative [Judge]
Attention: Sheila Rene Tillerson Adams,
Office of Associate [Judge] Upper Marlboro County Circuit Court, 5th [Judicial] District
Attention: Hassan Ali El-Amin
Office of Court Administrator
Attention: Sondra D. Battle
Office of Court Psychiatrist Circuit Court
Attention: Thomas J. Oglesby
Office of Director,
Attention: Mary Lou McDonough
Office of President,
Michael R. Merican,
Office of Chair Executive Officer,
Anthony R. Bambocci
Office of Administrative Commissioner
Attention: Markisha Gross,

Date: 9 September 1433 M.C. [2013 C.C.Y.]

“There is therefore, secondly, another way whereby governments are dissolved, and that is, when the legislative, or the prince, either of them, act contrary to their trust. First, The legislative acts against the trust reposed in them, when they endeavor to invade the property of the subject, and to make themselves, or any part of the community, masters, or arbitrary disposers of the lives, liberties, or fortunes of the people.” – “The Second Treatise of Civil Government” (1690) by John Locke, at Chapter XIX “Of the Dissolution of Government” Sec. 221.

Greetings to all public servants of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, all its sub-corporations/enclaves specifically “THE STATE OF MARYLAND”, et al, at Northwest Amexem/Northwest Africa/North America/The North Gate, Maghrib’ al’ Aqca, (Morocco the extreme west).

Re: Kidnapping of Moorish American National Issa Ra El, ex-Relatione Patrick C Lewis

We send this communication to you regarding all Moors at Northwest Amexem/North Africa/North American/The North Gate with a focus on Issa Ra El Ex-Relatione [Patrick C. Lewis] Aboriginal Indigenous Moor of Maghrib’ al’ Aqca with a political jurisdiction of Moorish American National.

As has been previously notified, the public servants operating through the corporate fiction, STATE OF MARYLAND, have kidnapped our Moor, Issa Ra El.

They are currently holding him hostage for a demand of ransom, which is “income” unlawfully obtained by a foreign for-profit corporation, of 15,000.00 credit [USC Federal Reserve Notes (FRN)].

At law this is an “Act of War” against the Aboriginal Indigenous People of Maghrib’ al’ Aqca by out of control public servants of which have taken an “Oath of Office” and receive a salary/income to uphold the American Constitution 1791.

These public servant have invaded the privacy of our Moor Issa Ra El and presume to be the “parent” of the child that Issa Ra El is the “Housebinder” of, with an obligation that is of no concern of any government much less a foreign European private for profit corporation.

The actions of the public servants operating through the STATE OF MARYLAND, is in fact “The Doctrine of Discovery”, and Genocide.

These public servants have raised themselves by their actions to a status of “Beneficiary” and have unlawfully lowered/Denationalized the People, Moors, to a status of “public servant/Slave” obligated to the tenants of “Statutes”, “Ordinances”, “Codes”, and “Executive Orders”. All of which can only apply to government Public Servants.

The question that we Moors, Aboriginal Indigenous to the land ask and demand an answer to is:

• At what point was law drafter giving the public servant authority to regulate the actions/activity of the Aboriginal Indigenous People of Northwest Amexem/North Africa/North America/The North Gate?
• For the Record, On the Record, and Let the Record show the lawful, verifiable, documented proof of such a law in accordance with the American Constitution 1791?

Our Moor National Issa Ra El, identified himself as Issa Ra El Moor Aboriginal Indigenous and the foreign European aliens instead branded, thereby denationalizing and imposing “Capitis Diminutio Maxima” on our Moorish American National Issa Ra El with the unlawful status of “Black”, and imposed a fiction of “PATRICK C LEWIS” on him.

Black’s Law 4th Edition Dictionary:
Capitis Diminutio Maxima – The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.

The above clearly shows the intend of the public servants operating through the STATE OF MARYLAND, as that of Treason, Genocide, Denationalization, Slavery, Theft, Kidnapping, Extortion, Racketeering, Misprision, Misrepresentation, Rape, etc., and all have violated their “Oath of Office”, the American Constitution, and have in fact breached the longest running treaty in the world, the “Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1786”.

When our Moor National Issa Ra El advised them that that fictitious name is not him, he was taken to a cell and left there while other foreign European aliens operating through the STATE OF MARYLAND imposed a ransom/surety bond on our Moor National Issa Ra El under the fiction PATRICK C LEWIS warehouse#010491 in the PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY JAIL 13400 Dille Drive UPPER MARLBORO MARYLAND 20772 (301) 952-4800/(301) 952-7102 /(301) 952-7164 EMAIL

The act of imposing a “surety bond” on the Aboriginal People whom said public servants operating through the STATE OF MARYLAND, took an “Oath of Office” to protect, thereby obtaining “income” outside of their salary for protecting the “Liberties” of the People is “Treason”

For said public servants operating through the STATE OF MARYLAND to intrude on the private affairs of this Moorish American National and presume to hold, charge, and demand an accounting of his personal and private affairs with the assumed intent to provide for Issa Ra El’s child via a fraudulent agency that is not Constitutionally Sanctioned is Treason and Genocide in that by their action it is their intent to divide and break up the family unit for ill intent, direct operation of the “Doctrine of Discovery” and is in direct violation the “United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide” where it states
• Article II
• (b) “ Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group”.
• (c) of “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”,
It has been well documented in the United Nations “Preliminary Study of the Doctrine of Discovery that the foreign European aliens operating through and for profit corporations doing business as the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and all its sub-corporations, i.e. the STATE OF MARYLAND, are in fact and has “for centuries used the Doctrine of Discovery as legal rational for stealing land and dehumanizing Aboriginal Indigenous People…”, the Moors of Maghrib’ al’ Aqca, Northwest Amexem / Northwest Africa / North America. / The North Gate.

It has been further stated in the “Preliminary Study of the Doctrine of Discovery”, which “revealed that the Doctrine, along with papal bulls dating back to the fifteenth century, and other such Vatican documents and royal charters, had evolved – with disastrous effect on the world’s Indigenous Nations and Peoples — into an interpretative framework that had become institutionalized in law and policy, at National and International levels.”

“That interpretive framework is the root problem facing Indigenous Peoples,” emphasizing its two elements: dehumanization and dominance. For centuries, the terrible scenario played out thusly: A Christian monarch who located or “discovered” non-Christian lands and territories had the right to claim a superior and paramount title to those territories. Further, the Doctrine held that non-Christian lands were considered to belong to no one, and once a Christian monarch had claimed the right of dominion, that claim was transferred to other political successors.”

Some may well ask, how do the actions of the public servants operating through the STATE OF MARYLAND, become the action of a “Christian monarch”?

The answer is found in the definition of “municipal”

Webster’s Universal Dictionary of the English Language 1940
Municipal – L. municipalis, from municipium, a town subject to Rome,…

Websters International Dictionary w/ History Reference 1910
Municipal – L. municipalis, fr. Municeps an inhabitant of a municipium, or town possessing the right of Roman citizenship…
The above denotes and affirms that the unsanctioned municipal corporation established in 1871 and today doing business as “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” with all its enclaves/sub-corporations, “STATE OF <>/COMMONWEALTH OF <>” are in fact of law “Roman Venues”.

At what point in history did the Moors, Aboriginal Indigenous to the land give permission for persons operating through a “Roman Venue” the authority to regulate the actions/activities of the Moors?

Pursuant to the Emergency Banking Act of 9 March 1933 and Congressman James Traficant in his speech on the floor of congress of 17 March 1993 where he states the following:

“Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government… The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations…”

The above affirms that the true administrators of the Bankrupt entity and all its personnel is the United Nations.

Therefore, we Moors of Maghrib’ al’ Aqca demand the following:

• The immediate release of our Moorish American National Issa Ra El, and any other declared Moor being held hostage.
• That you get your employees in order and clean house so they may no longer injure the Moors, or any other People.
• The Estate of the Moors, unlawfully converted to “States” be turned back over to the Moors pursuant to your agreement in the “United Nations Declaration of Rights of Indigenous People”, “United Nations Decolonization 1514”, and “Multilateral International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”,
• We demand the full enforcement of the violations against the Moors pursuant to the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

As you are aware and know, the Moors, our Estate, the land and all its resources, cannot be under the jurisdiction of any foreign European alien that we adopted into our Nation and gave reprise from the untoward treatment they received. Out of the goodness of our hearts we extended a helping hand to those foreign Europeans who are stateless and have no Nation unless adopted by the Moors of this land/planet.

This is what the “Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1786” and the “American Constitution of 1791” adopted for the Union States of America did for the foreign European aliens/stateless/nationless people. This charitable act in no way turned over and/or gave any foreign European alien any jurisdiction to control, regulate, imprison any Moor in our own house. That house being the land of our foremothers and forefathers, Northwest Amexem / Northwest Africa / North America / The North Gate.

Once again we demand the immediate release of our Moor Issa Ra El and any and all “Declared” Moor under the political jurisdiction of the Moorish American National.
Creditor’s initials.
Honourably Yours.
By: Princeps: Dominus Nobilis El, Third Party Intervener, Power of Attorney in Fact, Authorized Representative for: ‘Issa Ra El’, and “Ex-Relation Patrick Christopher Lewis, CESTUI QUE TRUST. All Rights Reserved, U.C.C. 1-207/1-308/1-209; U.C.C. 1-103, Without Recourse.

Cc: United Nations International Court of Justice United States Justice Department
High Commissioner for Human Rights Peace Palace United States Attorney General
Navanethem Pillay The Hague Netherland Eric H. Holder Jr.

U.S. Department of State International Criminal Court Interpol
Secretary Jerry Forbes Kerry Luis Moreno-Ocampo Lyon, France

Great Seal National Association Great Seal National Association Great Seal National Association
of Moorish Affairs of Moorish Affairs of Moorish Affairs
Minister: A-El Minister: William Salaam Hall :El Minister: Funtayus Flewellen El

THE WHITE HOUSE Federal Trade Commission Federal Communications Commission
The Honorable President Barack Obama Jon Leibowitz, Commissioner Julius Genachowski, Chairman

Universal Postal Union Organization of American States
Edouard Dayan, Director General Ricardo Mario Dominquez

Issa Ra El – MARYLAND public servants engaging in Doctrine of Discovery v2

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment