Judgment filed 1-22-2011 regarding Moor of Northwest Amexem

Zilliah S. El – Judgment 012211 v1
Above link has signed Judgments.

The following Judgment has been filed 1/22/2011 regarding case/docket#7009 0080  0001 3575 4799.

In accordance with the following Maxim At Law:
—All men shall have a remedy by the due course of law. If a remedy does not exist, or if the existing remedy has been subverted. then one may create a remedy for themselves and endow it with credibility by expressing it in their affidavit.

THE MOORISH NATIONAL REPUBLIC
THE MOORISH DIVINE AND NATIONAL MOVEMENT OF THE WORLD
Aboriginal and Indigenous Natural Peoples of North-West Amexem North America

Judgment
Exhibit AO
Case/Docket # 7009 0080 0001 3575 4799

http://moorishnews.wordpress.com/

SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT
Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers
231 Capitol Avenue
Corporate HARTFORD CONNECTICUT 06106

On December 18, 2010 a suit was filed in the Supreme Court of Connecticut. A copy was sent to the Clerk of the Office and Chief Justice Chase Rogers. Both received the Writ on December 21, 2010 Chief Justice Rogers Article#7009 0080 0001 3575 4805 and the Clerk of the Office on Article#7009 0080 0001 3575 4799.

There has been no response from either the Clerk or Chief Justice Chase Rogers.

As the above public servants have not keep their obligations to the People and assigned this matter a Case Number and reviewed the facts involved.

The following has been initiated based on the Supreme Law of the Land, the United States Republic Constitution / Treaty, and Declarations by the United Nations and the Vienna Convention.

As Zilliah S. El is a Moorish American National, Jus Sanguinis, she is protected under International Law, the United States Republic Constitution and the Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1787.

Jus Sanguinis – Citizenship is not determined by place of birth, but by having a parent(s) who are citizens of the nation. Jus Sanguinis rights are mandated by international treaty, with citizenship definitions imposed by the international community.

In Accordance with the Treaty of Peace and Friendship, the agreement between Europeans and Moors was to allow Europeans to come to this land and engage in Life Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness free of oppression as was not the case on the land today known as Europe.

The Treaty in no way gave any land as the land and the resources is and are inheritance of the People and is/are Unalienable and Inalienable.

Black’s Law 4th Edition Dictionary

Unalienable – Inalienable; incapable of being aliened, that is, sold and transferred.

Inalienable – Not subject to alienation; the characteristic of those things which cannot be bought or sold or transferred from one person to another, such as rivers and public highways, and certain personal rights; e.g., liberty.

It can never be sold by one or all, it cannot be contracted, it can not be transferred, it can not be obtained by intermarriage, or interbreeding.

In Accordance with Title 22 Chapter 2 sections 141-143 Consular Courts – Act August 1, 1956 repealed sections 141 to 143 effective upon the date which the President determined to be appropriate for the relinquishment of jurisdiction of the United States in Morocco. Jurisdiction of the United States in Morocco was relinquished by memorandum of President Eisenhower dated September 15, 1956 and The Sundry Free Moor Act of 1789-1790.

Consular Court was convened on January Nineteenth, One thousand four hundred and thirty-first  one year of Allah, (C.C.Y 2011) it was determined by the Moors of this land that the Case Number for this issue will be the PostMaster Article Number: 7009 0080 0001 3575 4799, which was sent to the Clerk of the Court.

As all parties to this issue where lawfully notified and copies of the Writ was sent to each certified Mail – See Certificate of Mailing and received. And each Plaintiff was given ten (10) days to respond that date being December 31, 2010, and

As no rebuttal was received from any of the Plaintiffs, a Default Judgment was sent certified mail on January 8, 2011 and was publicly published (http://www.moorishnationpublicrecords.com/recording-of-default-and-liens.html) and submitted to the United Nations, International Criminal Court, International Court of Justice, The Federal Bureau of Investigation – New York, Connecticut, and Washington DC, United States Justice Department, United States Department of State.

In Addition, a “QuitClaim – Transfer of Inheritance” and “Al Seisin In Deed” regarding Lat / Long: 41.7732343 / -72.6352218 [45 Olmsted Near Corporate EAST HARTFORD CONNECTICUT 06108] Northwest Amexem was also filed into the record with the Supreme Court of Connecticut, United Nations, International Criminal Court, International Court of Justice, The Federal Bureau of Investigation – New York, Connecticut, and Washington DC, United States Justice Department, United States Department of State and was also publicly published (http://moorishnews.wordpress.com/).

In Accordance with the United States Republic Constitution Article I of the Bill of Rights:

Congress shall make no law … petition the government for a redress of grievances.

The Writ / Petition was lawfully submitted, as there was no rebuttal within the ten (10) day allotted timeframe, nor the additional days allotted making the total time to rebut approximately thirty-four (34) days. Standard time frame for any rebuttal is thirty (30) days therefore with dishonor the parties to this Writ / Petition have not rebutted and this issue stands as judgment.

— Truth stands supreme.

— Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.

— An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.

— An un-rebutted affidavit stands as the truth.

The following judgment is as follows:

The land and resources so named at Lat / Long: 41.7732343 / -72.6352218 [45 Olmsted Near Corporate EAST HARTFORD CONNECTICUT 06108] Northwest Amexem is henceforth cured and reverts back to the true heirs to the land and resources, The Moors of Northwest Amexem-North America-North Gate Aboriginal Indigenous People of the Land.

All Plaintiffs named is said Writ / Petition file No# 7009 0080 0001 3575 4799 are ordered to pay the following: $75,000 for compensatory damages and $75,000 for punitive damages, payable in lawful money in accordance with the Coinage Act of April 2, 1792 or as petitioner(s) have specified “reserve the right to settle for a lesser fee”, payable per petitioner.

For all unpaid damages, the Petitioners have the lawful right to attach a “Lien” to all assets of/by each Plaintiff their spouse and any heirs until said torts have been cured.

This notice has been forwarded to the United Nations, International Criminal Court, International Court of Justice, United States Justice Department, Honorable President Barack Obama, Connecticut Attorney General’s Office, Sheriff’s Office, Connecticut Governors Office, Connecticut Secretary of State’s Office and Recorded for the Public Record on the county level, and Published via (http://moorishnews.wordpress.com/)

The above is In Accordance with the following provisions, Constitutions, and Treaties derived from ancient Moorish Law, and Declarations:

In accordance with the Declaration of Independence – We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are

Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness — That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it . . .

In Accordance with the United States Republic Constitution –

Article V

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution,

when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.

Article III, Section II

The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;–to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;–to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;–to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;–to controversies between two or more states;–between a state and citizens of another state;–between citizens of different states;–between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects. In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction.

Barbary Treaty – Treaty of Peace and Friendship signed at Tripoli November 4, 1796

Article 11

As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

Vienna Convention Article 36 – Consul shall be notified in issues regarding Nationals

In Accordance with the United Nations Decolonization – Declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples Resolution 1514 947 plenary meeting 14 December 1960 –

Declares that:

1.  The subjection of peoples to alien subjugation, domination and exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights, is contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and is an impediment to the promotion of world peace and co-operation.

3.     Inadequacy of political, economic, social or educational preparedness should never serve as a pretext for delaying independence.

4.     All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise peacefully and freely their right to complete independence, and the integrity of their national territory shall be respected.

5.     Immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and non-Self-Governing Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or colour, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and freedom.

6.     Any tempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.

7.     All States shall observe faithfully and strictly the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the present Declaration on the basis of equality, non-interference in the internal affairs of all States, and respect for the sovereign rights of all peoples and their territorial integrity.

In Accordance with the United Nations Rights of Indigenous People General Assembly Resolution 61/295 on 13 September 2007

Article 3
Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

Article 4
Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs, as well as ways and means for financing their autonomous functions.

Article 5
Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions, while retaining their right to participate fully, if they so choose, in the political, economic, social and cultural life of the State.

Article 6
Every indigenous individual has the right to a nationality.

Article 7
1. Indigenous individuals have the rights to life, physical and mental integrity, liberty and security of person.
Article 8
1. Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.
2. States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for:
(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;
(c) Any form of forced population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;
(d) Any form of forced assimilation or integration;
Article 9
Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right to belong to an indigenous community or nation, in accordance with the traditions and customs of the community or nation concerned. No discrimination of any kind may arise from the exercise of such a right.

Article 10
Indigenous peoples shall not be forcibly removed from their lands or territories. No relocation shall take place without the free, prior and informed consent of the indigenous peoples concerned and after agreement on just and fair compensation and, where possible, with the option of return.

Article 19
States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative institutions in order to obtain their free, prior and informed consent before adopting and implementing legislative or administrative measures that may affect them.

Article 20
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions, to be secure in the enjoyment of their own means of subsistence and development, and to engage freely in all their traditional and other economic activities.
2. Indigenous peoples deprived of their means of subsistence and development are entitled to just and fair redress.

Article 26
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.
2. Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and resources that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired.
3. States shall give legal recognition and protection to these lands, territories and resources. Such recognition shall be conducted with due respect to the customs, traditions and land tenure systems of the indigenous peoples concerned.

Article 28
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to redress, by means that can include restitution or, when this is not possible, just, fair and equitable compensation, for the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used, and which have been confiscated, taken, occupied, used or damaged without their free, prior and informed consent.
Article 30
1. Military activities shall not take place in the lands or territories of indigenous peoples, unless justified by a relevant public interest or otherwise freely agreed with or requested by the indigenous peoples concerned.
2. States shall undertake effective consultations with the indigenous peoples concerned, through appropriate procedures and in particular through their representative institutions, prior to using their lands or territories for military activities.

Article 35
Indigenous peoples have the right to determine the responsibilities of individuals to their communities.

Article 37
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the recognition, observance and enforcement of treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements concluded with States or their successors and to have States honor and respect such treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements.
2. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as diminishing or eliminating the rights of indigenous peoples contained in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements.

Article 38
States in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples, shall take the appropriate measures, including legislative measures, to achieve the ends of this Declaration.

Article 39
Indigenous peoples have the right to have access to financial and technical assistance from States and through international cooperation, for the enjoyment of the rights contained in this Declaration.

Article 40
Indigenous peoples have the right to access to and prompt decision through just and fair procedures for the resolution of conflicts and disputes with States or other parties, as well as to effective remedies for all infringements of their individual and collective rights. Such a decision shall give due consideration to the customs, traditions, rules and legal systems of the indigenous peoples concerned and international human rights.

Article 43
The rights recognized herein constitute the minimum standards for the survival, dignity and well-being of the indigenous peoples of the world.

Article 45
Nothing in this Declaration may be construed as diminishing or extinguishing the rights indigenous peoples have now or may acquire in the future.

Sincerely, and without malice

I declare under the Zodiac Constitution and the United States Republic Constitution that the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and honorable intent.

____________________________Seal:

United Nations

High Commissioner for Human Rights

Palais Wilson

International Criminal Court

Luis Moreno-Ocampo

Interpol

Lyon, France

Honorable President Barack Obama

White House Washington DC

United States Department of State

Hillary Clinton

Dannel P. Malloy, Governor

State Capitol 210 Capitol Avenue HARTFORD CONNECTICUT 06106

George C. Jepsen Attorney General

55 Elm Street Hartford Connecticut 06106

Federal Bureau of Investigation – Color of Law Violations

New Haven, New York, and Washington DC

WOODSIDE APARTMENT, LLC

Attn: Steven J. King & Barbara J. King

PO Box 296 TOLLAND CONNECTICUT 06084

W. Herbert Reckmeyer

PO Box 271376 WEST HARTFORD CONNECTICUT 06127

Phyllis Falk

75 Bellevue Avenue BRISTOL CONNECTICUT

ROCKVILLE BANK

William J. McGurk CEO

1645 Ellington Road SOUTH WINDSOR CONNECTICUT

STATE OF CONNECTICUT MARSHALL Grant Carragher

PO Box 612 WINDSOR CONNECTICUT 06095

Great Seal National Association of Moorish Affairs

Minister A. El

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s